Summary Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Summary - Essay ExampleAs such, America has a right to frustrate terrorist comics but under exceptional circumstances (Hickey, 2012). Crucial is the fact that terrorism does not take an uncaring approach. This is to say that terrorism does not restrict to breaking of a law. Acts of terrorism inflict disparage on third parties intimately of whom are innocent law abiding citizens. Terrorism is a crime against reality because it causes harm to individuals and undermines the sanctity of freedoms such as the right to life. Moher (2004), advocates for the use of torture using the argument a less(prenominal)er of the two evils. In the event that one person stands in the way of saving millions from harm by with holding information, then extreme measures are likely to suffice. However, sanctified the rights of an individual, the government is likely to shelter the masses rather than one person (Hickey, 2012). While describing the phrase a lesser of the two evils, utilitarianism is in p lay. This is the idea that a policy is as relevant as the extent to which it protects, to a greater advantage, the masses, as opposed to an isolated few. Nonetheless, there is a need to establish under what situation torture is logical and what form this torture entrust take. Currently, America utilizes the policy of torture under the Radar screen. This technique encompasses secret torture methods such as rendition. This is where the suspect is subject to interrogation in a nation that has less restrictive rules on torture by using torture lite methods. Moher (2004) holds that it is to a greater extent appropriate to repeat that torture exists and find a way to regulate it using the justice system. As such, he proposes utilizing a judicially sanctioned torture system. Under this judicial guise, torture will procure information from suspects with more advantages than disadvantages. First off, Moher (2004) reports on Professor Alan Dershowitzs theory who suggests that torture be m edically supervised to see to it that the process only causes pain and discomfort but not permanent body damage. Secondly, there will be some form of due process. This is because the suspects guilt is subject to the scrutiny of a neutral magistrate. Proofing beyond all reasonable doubt that a suspect has information is part of judicially sanctioned torture. Finally, in case of a fatality, the judicial system has the power to demand an explanation and, therefore, reducing the chances of extreme brutality on the suspects (Hickey, 2012). Moher (2004) argues that judicially sanctioned torture is, therefore, more humane than the current immunity system. Moreover, it is imperative to note that his stand on torture is in regard to the ticking bomb scenario. That is the suspect is holding information needed sooner rather than later, and the lack of this information could result in greater damage than torturing would cause. In summary, these arguments call for the use of logic rather than the inclination towards morality and its tie in emotional entanglements. Utilitarianism in this case is a logical approach (Hickey, 2012). Though most torture methods do not have a scientific basis, their success in obtaining information has proven adequate for the most part (Clarke, 2007). Expert interrogators claim that humans tend to avoid pain and discomfor