Thursday, December 26, 2019

Stereotypes and Stereotyping of Native Americans in The...

The Last of the Mohicans and Stereotyped Native Americans [1] Native Americans were part of this country long before our founding forefathers. They were the people that Christopher Columbus found inhabiting this land. There is even evidence to show that they have been on the American continents for thousands and even tens of thousands of years. Yet, somehow the European powers dominated these people, forcing them from their land to make it â€Å"ours.† In the early part of the twentieth century, a new industry began to develop; we call it the film industry. Along with the industry came movies that were made and are still made for the amusement of a mass audience. Some flaws did come with this industry, and among them was the†¦show more content†¦Filmmakers showed what they felt had already been conventional to their beliefs about Native Americans. In the film The Last of the Mohicans (1920) these two contrasting roles of Native Americans dominate most of the plot. The fiend is Magua, and the â€Å"noble† s avage is Uncas. These two roles that are shown of Native Americans have some historical ground, but what makes one side good and the other bad? Is it because that is how society wants to see them? And does the director’s representation of the two sides gain them acceptance in American culture? In the history of America, Native American tribes often became associated with similar tribes with similar beliefs. This is true of the two tribes in The Last of the Mohicans. The Huron, who according to the historical events of Fort William Henry are the Iroquois and the Mohicans are historically associated with the Delaware. The Huron in the various versions of The Last of the Mohicans, come to represent the Iroquois who were allied with the French, and were seen as evil in the eyes of the British. The Mohicans, historically come to represent the noble Delaware, who were allied to the British. These tribes get grouped together, the â€Å"Huron [became] condensed into the sam e entity as Maquas, Mingoes and Mohawks and contrasted with the superior virtue of the Delawares and Mohicans† (Clark 122). These tribes were constantly intermixedShow MoreRelatedEssay on Stereotypes and Stereotyping of Native Americans2394 Words   |  10 PagesThe Stereotyping of Native Americans Until fairly recently the popular culture of American literature and film did not attempt to study the true representations of Indians in North America. Instead they chose to concentrate on the romanticized/savage version of Native people: which is an idealistic view of a Native with long, beautiful flowing hair riding on a horse obsessed with chanting and praying to the savageness of a rowdy, wild Native causing unnecessary mayhem to the white people

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Greek Healthcare Students Knowledge And Perceptions On...

Ruhavi Mudumba November 18, 2014 Paper Summary ID# 1001017760 CSE-5194 GREEK HEALTHCARE STUDENTS KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTIONS ON THE AIDS EPIDEMIC INTRODUCTION: The paper deals with the knowledge and perceptions of Greek healthcare students on the AIDS epidemic. The HIV disease is viewed as the most obvious string for general wellbeing around the world(1). Since the onset of the AIDS pestilence until late years, the malady predominance was discovered to be expanding(2). According to Dimitrios Zikos, Marianna Diomidous, Efrosini Tzimogianni, the increment in the quantities of HIV bearers and patients in Greece is because of a change in sexual conduct, concentrating on various sexual accomplices and additionally on the truth of not taking any precautionary measures amid the sexual demonstration. They also determine that the lion s share of the HIV positive diagnosed cases are youthful grown-ups in the age of 35 and more seasoned. According to few research studies conducted by Dimitrios Zikos, Marianna Diomidous, Efrosini Tzimogianni to investigate the attitudes and knowledge of 720 young students who were registered at the offi cial Greek Unemployment Organization, there was racism towards HIV carriers and patients. The research also resulted in a rate of 27.1% saying that HIV transporters and patients ought to be socially disengaged to abstain from spreading the ailment, while the 15.1% showed up for be aloof towards AIDS victimized people(3). In the sameShow MoreRelatedAnnotated Bibliography: Plagiarism39529 Words   |  158 PagesBuckwalter, J. A., Wright, T., Mogoanta, L. and Alman, B. (2012), Plagiarism: An assault on the integrity of scientific research. J. Orthop. Res., 30:  1867 1868. Granitz, N. and Loewy, D. (2007). Applying Ethical Theories: Interpreting and Responding to Student Plagiarism. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 293-306. Luke, B. and Kearins, K. (2012), Attribution of words versus attribution of responsibilities: Academic plagiarism and university practice. Vaccine, 30(50): 7131-7133. Rushby, N. (2013), PlagiarismRead MoreInternational Management67196 Words   |  269 Pagestransform the nature of their relationships with global organizations. As in the past, these developments underscore and reinforce the importance of understanding different cultures, national systems, and corporate management practices around the world. Students and managers now recognize that all business is global and that the world is now interconnected not only geographically but also electronically and psychologically; it is hard to imagine any business or nonbusiness organization that is not directlyRead MoreLgbt19540 Words   |  79 PagesUnion * Adoption * Military service * Legal aspects of transsexualism | Social attitudes | * Heteronormativity * LGBT stereotypes * Queer * Religion and homosexuality * Religion and transgender | Prejudice / Violence | * AIDS stigma * Biphobia * Genderism * Heterosexism * Homophobia * Lesbophobia * Binarism * Sexualism * Suicide among LGBT youth * Transphobia * Violence against LGBT people * LGBT trafficking | Academic fields and discourse | Read MoreStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 Pages978-0-13-283487-2 Brief Contents Preface xxii 1 2 Introduction 1 What Is Organizational Behavior? 3 The Individual 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Diversity in Organizations 39 Attitudes and Job Satisfaction 69 Emotions and Moods 97 Personality and Values 131 Perception and Individual Decision Making 165 Motivation Concepts 201 Motivation: From Concepts to Applications 239 3 The Group 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Foundations of Group Behavior 271 Understanding Work Teams 307 Communication 335 Leadership 367 PowerRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pages xvi CONTENTS P R E FA C E What’s New in This Edition? Based on suggestions from reviewers, instructors, and students we have made a number of changes in the eighth edition of Developing Management Skills. †¢ Added new skill assessments in Chapter 1 and a new case in Chapter 3. †¢ Revised parts of the book to reflect suggestions and feedback from instructors and students. †¢ Clarified instructions for scoring skill assessments and updated the comparison data for each assessment. †¢ Updated

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

Liability of Company to its Own Shareholders-Samples for Students

Questions: 1.What happens if a company employee who is also a shareholder and/or a director is negligent at work? Can a company be liable to its own shareholders under tort law? Explain with reference to relevant cases. 2.Can a company be guilty of a crime? If so, what principles will the court take into account as to whether it is the Company or individual actors within the company who are guilty? Answers: 1.It is a well-known principle of law that reads a company is a separate entity distinct from its members and shareholders. This principle has been established in the famous case of Salomon v Salomon Company Ltd[1], the court has observed that the solicitor can only represent a company only. Therefore, it can be stated that an invisible veil is present in between the company and the stakeholders. However, if the company has been incorporated for fraudulent purpose, the veil can be pierced. This principle has been established in Re a Company[2]. In Australia, there are several incidents regarding the negligent acts of directors are occurring. There are many judicial formulations there to define the liabilities of directors for performing negligent act. The Corporation Act 2001 prescribes certain provisions regarding the duties of the directors[3]. According to section 180 of Corporation Act, every director should have to work diligently and should perform their acts in good faith. In Charitable Corporations v Sutton[4], it has been observed by the court that in case the directors have failed to perform their duties with due diligence, they will be held responsible for that and face penalties under section 1317E of the Corporation Act 2001. In ASIC v Cassimetis[5], the director of the company who is also one of the shareholders in it had failed to perform his duty with due care and he has faced penalties due to this. In Ouerend 1 Gurney Co. v. Gibb[6], it has been observed by the court that the director should have to act like a prudent man and in case of any failure to this, he shall have to get penalties. The directors of a company have certain duties towards the shareholders and in case any failure regarding the same, the directors should have to face penalties. However, in certain case, it has been found that the directors are also shareholders to the company. In the case of Cassimetis, the directors of the alleged company have stated that they also incur the losses and therefore, they should not be held liable. In this case, court has observed that the law has not mentioned that directors who are also the shareholders in a company could not be held liable for negligent act. Therefore, it can be stated that if the directors will face penalties under the Corporation Act in case of negligent act. The general principle of law is that company is a separate entity. The directors are treated as the mind of the company and therefore, the acts of the directors are sometimes regarded as the acts of the company. The Tort law of Australia is derived its origin from English law. Under the Tort law, it has been prescribed that all the person has certain duties that should be performed with care and in case of any failure to this, the wrongdoer might have to face the penalties. In the case of Salomon v Salomon, the court has held that company is a separate person and therefore, if the company has failed to protect the interest of the shareholders by conducting fraud, the company will liable to the shareholders. Duty of care is certain legal obligations that are imposed on every individual. A person is restricted to do anything that causes harm to others and the act should be foreseeable in nature. In a case where a company has been incorporated with certain fraudulent purpose, the veil b etween the company and the directors will be lifted and the company will be held liable for any negligence under the Tort law of Australia. In Rainham Chemical Works Ltd (in liq.) v Belvedere Fish Guano Co. Ltd[7], it has been held by the court that where certain wrongful acts have been performed in a company, the company will be responsible for the consequence. If a director has committed a tort that is not distinct from the acts of the company, the company will be held liable. 2.It is a well-known principle of Company law that a company is a separate person and it will not be held liable for any of its stakeholders. This principle has been established for the first time in the case of Salomon v Salomon. However, there are certain situations where this principle has not been followed. In certain cases, where the corporation or the company has been incorporated for encompassing any fraudulent works, it has been stated by the law that if any member of the company will act in negligent way and earns profit for the company, it will be treated as the company is guilty for the crime[8]. Further, it is to be stated that company itself cannot perform an act by itself; the directors of the company are the mind. Therefore, if the directors are involved in certain fraudulent act and they are doing certain task or commit a crime for gaining illegal profit for the company, the whole company will be held liable for the crime and not the individual director. Now the question is when a company will be held liable for committing a crime. There are certain elements that are required to be fulfilled in case of committing a crime. These elements can be divided into two ways such as criminal intention and criminal act or omission. When any member of a company will meet all these requirements and they do this for the interest if the company, the company will be held liable for crime. As an example it can be stated a company that allows the employees to dump the hazardous substances in an illegal way, it can be assumed that the company is doing so for saving money from the aspects of disposal ground. Further, in na case where the agents of a company involve in certain acts, the company will be held liable and it is not required that the owners of the company are not involve in such act. In New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co. v. United States[9], it has been observed that a company can be liable for the bad conduct of the employees and in such case, the company has to be faced both the civil and criminal liabilities. The court can follow the principle of corporate liabilities or vicarious liability in case to held a company liable for any criminal acts. The concept of corporate liability has derived its origin from the provisions of Common law and the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth.) makes a statutory model for corporate liability that is criminal in nature. It is noted that the company can be held liable for both civil and criminal way. In Australia, there are certain cases where a company held liable for crime. White-collar crime and bribery are some of it. In Australia, many companies are involved in certain crimes that are committed by the business professionals during the course of their business. These crimes include fraud, bribery, ponzi schemes, money embezzlement, money laundering and forgery. According to section 12.3 of the Criminal Code of Australia, if the directors of a company have committed a criminal conduct during their occupation and they have prior knowledge regarding the same, company will be held liable for crime if the act has done for the interest of the company. Further, if any member of the company held liable for conducting any negligent work during the course of their business and if it has been proved that, the work has been committed for the interest of the company, the court can held the company liable for the acts. In Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass[10], it has been observed that the directors are regarded as the mind of the company and in case they are committing a crime, it will be treated as the mind of the directors reflect the mind of the company. In this case, the term corporate manslaughter has been used. In United States v Bank of New England[11], it has been observed by the court that aggregating knowledge of the members of the company regarding any criminal acts will held the whole company be responsible for a crime and this principle is known as aggregation principle. According to Gobert (2002), if a company has failed to report before appropriate authority regarding the fraud or failed to take any precautions regarding the same, it will be held liable for criminal offence[12]. However, the theory of corporate liability will help the court to find out the guilty of company and the members in case of any criminal offence. References: ASIC v Cassimetis (2016) FCA 1023 Charitable Corporations v Sutton (1742) 2 Atk 400 Corkery, Jim, Maiken Mikalsen, and Katie Allan.Corporate social responsibility: The good corporation. Centre for Commercial Law, 2017. New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co. v. United States (1909) 212 U.S. 481 Ouerend 1 Gurney Co. v. Gibb (1872) L.R. 5 H.L. 480 Paternoster, Ray. "Deterring Corporate Crime."Criminology Public Policy15.2 (2016): 383-386. Rainham Chemical Works Ltd (in liq.) v Belvedere Fish Guano Co. Ltd [1921] 2 AC 465 Re a Company (1985) [1985] BCLC 333 Reeves-Latour, Maxime, and Carlo Morselli. "Bid-rigging networks and state-corporate crime in the construction industry."Social Networks51 (2017): 158-170. Salomon v Salomon Company Ltd [1897] AC 2. In Battle v Irish Art Promotion Centre Limited [1968] IR 252 Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass[1972] AC 153 United States v Bank of New England(1987) 821 F2d 1897 AC 2. In Battle v Irish Art Promotion Centre Limited [1968] IR 252 (1985) [1985] BCLC 333 Reeves-Latour, Maxime, and Carlo Morselli. "Bid-rigging networks and state-corporate crime in the construction industry."Social Networks51 (2017): 158-170. (1742) 2 Atk 400 (2016) FCA 1023 (1872) L.R. 5 H.L. 480 [1921] 2 AC 465 Corkery, Jim, Maiken Mikalsen, and Katie Allan.Corporate social responsibility: The good corporation. Centre for Commercial Law, 2017. (1909) 212 U.S. 481 [1972] AC 153 (1987) 821 F2d 844 Paternoster, Ray. "Deterring Corporate Crime."Criminology Public Policy15.2 (2016): 383-386.

Monday, December 2, 2019

Night of the Scorpio Essay Example

Night of the Scorpio Paper The author in Sacrifice tries to put the reader in the perspective of the goat to make it feel more intense which takes place in the first and third stanza. In the fourth stanza, the children, blank templates, are looking on over this tableau, being programmed as though this is a normal occurrence.  The Night of the Scorpion had a lot of comparisons such as the peasants are compared to flys swarming and the shadows like giant scorpions.  The last stanza, in Sacrifice is a shock of sorts. We are not laying the foundations of a house and But another Dachau. There is so little preparation for this in the poem. Dachau is a concentration camp you would have to do research to find out what went on during the Second World War to understand what Rafat intended the audience to believe. Within Night of the Scorpion you can see panic in the fathers. As a married person I can feel what is going through the fathers thoughts. The team work that a partnership needs to survive, when one facet of the team has gone the team fall to pieces for a while, until a leader pulls the team together. This is one of the thoughts going through the fathers mind. Also there is the other thought of devotion and love for his wife. This leads him to try any thing in his power to keep the team together even thought he might be a sceptic with some of the ideas to help his wife. We will write a custom essay sample on Night of the Scorpio specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Night of the Scorpio specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Night of the Scorpio specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer For something to be as vividly in Ezekiels mind as when his mother got stung it must have been quite horrific. His Mother is glad it was not her children. As a parent it always seems that there is a stronger bond between the children and their mother, as she is pleased she was bitten and not the children. It was such a frantic poem but at least it did have a happy ending.  In Sacrifice why did Taufiq Rafat go to his friends house for this ceremony? This is the question I have been looking at in my endeavour to understand the poets mentality. If I was going to a ceremony which involved such a horrific sacrifice I would turn down the invitation. Overall the poem was very disturbing and I felt like putting it down after the first stanza. The last stanza highlight exactly how I feel about the whole poem, But another Dachau.  The poems where totally opposite to each other, one showing love, panic and relief the other showing brutality, control and disgust. My favourite was the Night of the Scorpion at least it had a happy ending.